La identificación precisa de autores e instituciones es clave para garantizar la calidad, trazabilidad y visibilidad de la producción científica. El uso de identificadores estándar como ORCID para los profesionales y ROR para las instituciones asegura una atribución correcta y homogénea de las contribuciones, reduciendo errores y carga administrativa.
ORCID vincula de forma única la actividad investigadora de cada autor y facilita su integración en plataformas y procesos de evaluación. ROR estandariza la identificación institucional, evitando duplicidades y mejorando la representación del impacto científico.
La correcta implementación de estos identificadores refuerza el posicionamiento y la visibilidad tanto de los profesionales como de la institución, y resulta esencial para acreditaciones, evaluaciones, memorias científicas, justificación de financiación y definición de indicadores de calidad e impacto.
Consensus Statements Among European Sleep Surgery Experts on Tongue, Hypopharynx, and Supraglottis Associated with Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Part 1: Evaluation and Decision Making.
Abstract:
Introduction: The tongue base, hypopharynx, and supraglottis (TngHpxSgl) play distinct roles in snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Aim of the Study: To assess the level of consensus on the assessment and decision-making for the management of snoring and OSA associated with TngHpxSgl. Methods: A set of statements on the assessment and decision-making for the management of snoring and OSA associated with TngHpxSgl was developed based on the literature and circulated among 12-panel members of European experts on sleep surgery, using the modified Delphi method, seeking at least 80% consensus. Responses were categorized as agree or disagree for each statement, and the comments from the panelists were used to assess the level of consensus. Statements containing aggregated anonymized responses and comments were sent to each panel member in the second and final rounds of the survey. Results: The final set included 147 statements. Of these, 52.6%, 14.7%, and 5.8% achieved consensus among all 12, 11, and 10 panelists, respectively. Conclusions: There was a high level of consensus (73.2%) among European sleep surgery experts on the statements. This consensus will help establish standards and guide further research on snoring and OSA related to TngHpxSgl. (Summary)
